Abk�rzung zur Hauptnavigation
Abk�rzung zu den Newsmeldungen
Abk�rzung zu den Topstories
Inhaltsbereich
### Bias-reduced and separation-proof conditional logistic regression with small or sparse data sets

### Bias-reduced and separation-proof conditional logistic regression with small or sparse data sets

## Quick Links

## Featured

Heinze, G. & Puhr, R. (2010): *Statistics in Medicine* 29, 770 - 777

Conditional logistic regression is used for the analysis of binary outcomes when subjects are stratified into several subsets, e. g., matched pairs or blocks. Log odds ratio estimates are usually found by maximizing the conditional likelihood. This approach eliminates all strata-specific parameters by conditioning on the number of events within each stratum. However, in the analyses of both an animal experiment and a lung cancer case-control study conditional maximum likelihood (CML) resulted in infinite odds ratio estimates and monotone likelihood. Estimation can be improved by using Cytel Inc.'s well-known LogXact software, which provides a median unbiased estimate and exact or mid-p confidence intervals. Here we suggest and outline point and interval estimation based on maximization of a penalized conditional likelihood in the spirit of Firth's (Biometrika 1993; 80:27 {38) bias correction method (CFL). We present comparative analyses of both studies, demonstrating some advantages of CFL over competitors. We report on a small-sample simulation study where CFL log odds ratio estimates were almost unbiased, while LogXact estimates showed some bias and CML estimates exhibited serious bias. Con¯dence intervals and tests based on the penalized conditional likelihood had close-to-nominal coverage rates and yielded highest power among all methods compared, respectively. Therefore, we propose CFL as an attractive solution to the stratified analysis of binary data, irrespective of the occurrence of monotone likelihood.

A SAS program implementing CFL is available at: http://www.meduniwien.ac.at/cemsiis/kb/wissenschaft-forschung/software/statistische-software

Um den **Volltext **zu bestellen, geben Sie bitte Ihre E-Mail-Adresse bekannt:

Heinze, G. & Puhr, R. (2010): *Statistics in Medicine* 29, 770 - 777

Conditional logistic regression is used for the analysis of binary outcomes when subjects are stratified into several subsets, e. g., matched pairs or blocks. Log odds ratio estimates are usually found by maximizing the conditional likelihood. This approach eliminates all strata-specific parameters by conditioning on the number of events within each stratum. However, in the analyses of both an animal experiment and a lung cancer case-control study conditional maximum likelihood (CML) resulted in infinite odds ratio estimates and monotone likelihood. Estimation can be improved by using Cytel Inc.'s well-known LogXact software, which provides a median unbiased estimate and exact or mid-p confidence intervals. Here we suggest and outline point and interval estimation based on maximization of a penalized conditional likelihood in the spirit of Firth's (Biometrika 1993; 80:27 {38) bias correction method (CFL). We present comparative analyses of both studies, demonstrating some advantages of CFL over competitors. We report on a small-sample simulation study where CFL log odds ratio estimates were almost unbiased, while LogXact estimates showed some bias and CML estimates exhibited serious bias. Con¯dence intervals and tests based on the penalized conditional likelihood had close-to-nominal coverage rates and yielded highest power among all methods compared, respectively. Therefore, we propose CFL as an attractive solution to the stratified analysis of binary data, irrespective of the occurrence of monotone likelihood.

A SAS program implementing CFL is available at: http://www.meduniwien.ac.at/cemsiis/kb/wissenschaft-forschung/software/statistische-software

To order **full paper** please fill in your e-mail address: